FunctionX DAO governance

Hi again ! @zaccheah @DavidK

I think I can express most of public validators and delegators disappointment wrt. what just happened for Proposal #8.
The only way for this proposal to get thru 40% quorum was to have only the 5 biggest team addresses to vote, whatever the vote was.
Here, the complete absence of vote from the team (except the few delegations to some public delegators) is totally disorienting me : the team currently holds almost 65-70% of the delegated tokens !
How can we expect any public proposal to reach 40% quorum if the team doesn’t vote ?

You’re looking for people ready to eat, drink and sleep their FX project, and yet, you didn’t even take 1 minute to consider the current issue.
93% of FX delegators/voters did vote YES (70M FX tokens, so, much more than half of the public delegated tokens !!): doesn’t that seem like we deserve some explanation ?

Solution 1 : the team is forbidden to delegate its tokens and to be rewarded with APY : this would lower the quorum by a significant level. But that would also significantly increase the APY.
Solution 2 : the team HAS to always vote : at least using EGF address and unconverted PUNDIX tokens address.
…other solutions : to be considered.

Thanks in advance.

6 Likes