No the reason you didn’t go find it is because it doesn’t exist and who are you!? I don’t follow you on social media and only followed the instructions in the wallet so again if the instructions would have been what I said earlier then it would have been clear! It was not clear and it also did not instruct me to go see what you had to say about the situation.
Some of you seem a bit hard of understanding, comprehension lacking or something. I originally posted this a while back and my account was on hold for however long and once it was released today someone commented and this is why you are aware of my issue not because I am still seeking a remedy, so your comments are “moot”.
As I said, I was directed to this forum from a Reddit user some time ago who was trying to help. I have long taken my business to projects that are clear and profitable. At this point who cares!? Stop commenting and let it rest unless you can fix the issue.
Firstly, there should be a warning in the app that says if you do not do a first claim, the rest of the tokens will be forfeited.
For example now, we currently need a caution message for users to leave behind a little FX for future transactions because sometimes as humans, we are forgetful and we just click “Max” and delegate.
But to their defend, there were a lot of medium articles, tweets, instructions and blogpost being pushed out to let investors know that if there is no claim, the tokens will be forfeited. They even highlighted numerous times on all of their social media - NO CLAIM NO TOKENS
Secondly, it is your fault not following up on all the updates of the coin you’ve invested in. No due diligence done on your part.
I’m sorry for your loss but the right thing to do was to actually follow up on all updates.
the topic is Mute though how long now nearly 1 year? subject is old news, that staking was a 1 off event the situations now have no relevance. the project can’t except responsibility for others inaction as the staking clearly warned there are risks in staking it’s on you if you participate & the process mapped out, I don’t know about other people but I made sure I knew all I needed to in reading that and knew well before first claims from project material what had to be done & relayed that non stop nearly everyday in telegram, i could go through the telegram post in the official Pundi groups and find hundreds of times the necessity to do first claim was posted.
Finally someone with some kind of conversational sense.
I guess you may be right about my fault part, but I tried too many times to reach out to whomever through the contact and request feature on the wallet. There has never been a response from a human only a bot.
I left the chat open for hours a few times and all I ever got was something like a live rep would be with me shortly. I like the direct approach and the contact us and create a request options in the wallet is all anyone should ever need.
I have been dealing with crypto for a while on several wallets and platforms and have never had to go anywhere but the native app to communicate with the admin/staff.
If they were really concerned about building a trusting community, they would have done everything they could to correct this matter for those affected. I have accidentally sent MATIC to an ERC-20 wallet and a few other similar mistakes and gotten it recovered by the admins because they actually cared to resolve a mistake on the end users behalf.
In this case I made no mistake. I followed the same instructions that told me how to stake them and I read through it at least 6 times to prevent this type of situation, so I really can’t own very much of this mistake other than dealing with this wallet in the first place.
Thanks for your ability to see what I mean by them not articulating the no first claim no claim ever issue I have. That seems real simple to add to the instructions. Almost no one could get that wrong. That has been my main and only issue besides how ridiculous the ETH gas fees were/are. Why developers still use this blockchain is such a mystery to me.
The pre-governance staking was done before mainnet launch so it had to be done on Ethereum.
Unfortunately, Ethereum has one of the longest track record so developers and institutions still use them as it is known to be trustworthy and have a decent liquidity moving in/out.
Moving forward, i hope there will be caution messages in the app itself in the future to avoid any misunderstanding. And also, for you, i guess it would be wiser to follow up on updates closely especially Twitter and their articles.
Also, you would probably get a faster response if you post it on forum support.
Yep yep. I appreciate your conversation and understanding. These other cats that have responded minus one or two seem a bit dense.
They definitely didn’t do a good job of explaining in app and yes since then I realized that a lot of these communities like to give the real information on a discord or medium post, which I did not know at the time I ventured into this project. Lesson learned.
I personally have 4 ETH I have been holding on to so I do understand the “value” of it, but I am holding close to 40 AVAX and 20 SOL. I am actually mining AVAX on Unmineable. Those platforms are going to give ETH a run for the money!! Way faster and cheaper gas fees, also COSMOS.
Almost every network is trying to work with Terra to expand each other’s network, major exchanges has made UST into the official pairing meaning you can buy any crypto with UST and you can buy UST directly with credit/debit card.
If the app has access to Anchor Protocol, the amount of users that may use f(x)wallet is pretty much giganormous.
It will also open their eyes to Pundi X Chain / Function X Chain which is basically free marketing.
The way i see it is to implement it and communicate with Do Kwon so he can tweet or retweet about our app when you guys implement their networks and protocols then you will see a ton of users coming in.
I have to say I don’t like the new beta at all. find it totally complicated with the asset on the home page to get to the right address in my opinion too many clicks are necessary. why don’t we just leave it as easy as before. please change
best regards Sylvia
I bet the team could really use a UX expert, specialized in humain sciences.
My experience in such domain is that we (computer sciences) neglect too much their added value.
Just noticed f(x)wallet was now available on WalletConnect for dApps to connect.
Thanks for making this possible (I requested it on apr 24th and it was done on 28th!!!) !
One comment though: it was told on Telegram but I didn’t see anything about it in this forum.
Actually, I couldn’t see it because the filter is not working when using “f(x)” using parenthesis…
Anyway, would it be possible to know the WC URI ? and to share the WC configuration parameters ?
As you can see, this wallet tells you exactly what the signing is for, its limited permission and what it can’t do.
The current problem crypto users face nowadays is that most users don’t know what they’re signing for because it doesn’t list out all the permissions. Developers are trying to change this.
To prevent hacks and scams, wallet providers have been trying to do this.
Whenever you sign, the wallet will tell you what the signing is for and its permission type, as you can see in the picture above.
I feel this is one of the most important feature a wallet can have, LIKE REALLY.
Limited Permission (Ticks)
What It Can’t Do (Cross) - Eg. This does not allow the app to transfer tokens
Everyone will be able to feel safe signing into any app because everything will be listed out. I honestly think this is game-changing, it saves you time also.
Another security feature that i came across is Terra Station - Non-Whitelisted Website Auto Warning.
As you can see, whenever you visit a non-whitelisted domain, the wallet will automatically trigger a pop up warning saying it isnt an official domain.
I’m seeing a lot of security partnership recently regarding all these security stuff.
Before mass adoption can take place, major companies will do whatever it can to make sure it is safe for the common user since hacks/scams are getting very creative these days.
Would these 2 feature be possible? Maybe not now but i wonder if it could be considered since it is for security purposes.
This version is neater, more easier to differentiate and understand though.
All wallet providers in the future will implement readable signatures for the user to know exactly what they are signing up for, to prevent hacks/scams.
MetaMask just implemented their version of readable signatures / transactions to better protect users from malicious token approval / smart contract allowances.
. Smart minds think alike 
