====About question 1:naming ====
f(X)pay or variant (fxpay, xpay ) seems to be the standout winner. Yes @eduardstal on trademark check.
@Superbit123 “XPOS Chain” had me initially, easy to relate for new hodlers. Strictly though it is is not just meant for XPOS. It is also for XWallet, XPASS and future payments. Hence I changed my mind to fxpay.
====About question 2: minting====
@SCENE on NFTs. One such use case is to encourage NFT teams that use Function X to create their new chains to airdrop some NFTs to our holders. It’s like your day 1 drop. NFT is one reward mechanism reward but not the only one for the reward token.
Interesting idea @ClaudioxBarros on BEP20. We migrated NPXSXEM to BEP2 (not BEP20) but BEP2 didn’t really take off as Binance itself moved to BEP20. One way is to convert NPXSXEM to BEP20 from BEP2 and make it a reward token for $PUNDIX holders. @LKYBOB had similar suggestion in this forum thread. I suggest you post your idea there too @ClaudioxBarros
Finally, let me repeat we are NOT considering option 3.
====Others====
Majority of our non-engineers are focused on businesses and deployments @fishfish. Most leads can’t be discuss openly due to NDAs unlike tokenomics which can be openly debated.
Yes on the creation of XPOS service node @Kaiser.
@Ejorog 's suggestion on whether PUNDIX will get FX is answered this thread. @Cryptogon13 you’re right that the FX allocation for PUNDIX holder might come from the FX’s ecosystem and developer pool, also mentioned in the other thread.